Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deputation of personnel to an Indian company on a hire basis created a permanent establishment of the foreign enterprise in India and whether the amounts received were taxable as business income in India.
Analysis: The arrangement showed that the foreign enterprise only selected and supplied personnel who worked under the direction, supervision and control of the Indian company. The foreign enterprise did not render services through those personnel, had no control over their work, and the Indian company could remove them. The amounts received were only reimbursement of salaries paid in advance to the deputed personnel. On these facts, the deputation was not a technical service arrangement and did not amount to a permanent establishment. Even assuming a permanent establishment, no profit arose in India because the receipts were only reimbursement of expenses.
Conclusion: The foreign enterprise did not have a permanent establishment in India and the reimbursement receipts were not taxable as business income in India.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge failed and the addition was not sustainable, as the income arose only by way of salary reimbursement for personnel working under the Indian company's control.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere deputation of personnel under the control and supervision of the Indian company, with receipts confined to reimbursement of salary cost, does not create a permanent establishment or taxable profit in India.