Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand raised under the head of tour operators service.
Analysis: The appellant was engaged in transporting passengers between Pune and Mumbai Airports using hired buses. The records indicated that at least one bus used by the appellant was covered by a tourist permit for part of the disputed period, and the appellant's own statement supported the Revenue's case that the vehicles operated under a contract carriage arrangement. The appellant had also admitted tax liability for a portion of the demand and had paid some service tax for one year. In these circumstances, the cited decisions were treated as not assisting the appellant for the present stay application.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit. A partial pre-deposit was directed, and stay of recovery was granted only to the limited extent implicit in that direction.