Land valuation accepted, shares loss not speculative. Majority directs final decision.

The Third Member of the court agreed with the Judicial Member on both issues, accepting the assessee's computation of long-term capital gain based on the fair market value of the land and ruling that the loss on shares' transaction should be treated as a short-term capital loss rather than speculative. The case was directed to the regular Bench for a final decision in line with the majority opinion.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Confirmation of addition made on account of long-term capital gain.
2. Treatment of loss on shares' transaction as speculative loss instead of short-term capital loss.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Confirmation of Addition on Account of Long-term Capital Gain:

The primary issue revolved around the computation of long-term capital gain from the sale of a cold storage unit. The assessee, a partnership firm, sold its cold storage unit and computed the long-term capital gain by taking the fair market value of the land as on 1st April 1981 at Rs. 20 per sq. mtr. The Assessing Officer (AO) disagreed and computed the capital gain by taking the fair market value at Rs. 4 per sq. mtr., based on the Inspector's report which considered the land as agricultural. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's addition.

The Judicial Member (JM) sided with the assessee, stating that the land was used for commercial purposes, and agricultural rates were not applicable. The Accountant Member (AM) disagreed, suggesting a remand to the CIT(A) for further investigation. The Third Member (P.K. Bansal) agreed with the JM, emphasizing that the AO's reliance on agricultural land rates was inappropriate. The Third Member concluded that the fair market value of Rs. 20 per sq. mtr. as estimated by the assessee was justified and accepted the long-term capital gain computation by the assessee, negating the need for further investigation by the CIT(A).

2. Treatment of Loss on Shares' Transaction as Speculative Loss:

The second issue concerned the treatment of a short-term capital loss of Rs. 41,27,145 from the purchase and sale of shares. The AO treated the transaction as speculative, citing the absence of distinctive share numbers and the demat account being in the name of a partner, not the firm. The CIT(A) upheld this view.

The JM argued that the transactions involved actual delivery of shares, supported by contract notes and bank statements, and thus did not fall under speculative transactions as per Section 43(5) of the IT Act. The AM, however, questioned the genuineness of the transactions and suggested a remand for further verification.

The Third Member (P.K. Bansal) supported the JM's view, emphasizing that the AO had not doubted the genuineness of the transactions but had merely treated them as speculative. The Third Member noted that the demat account in the partner's name was permissible under NSDL guidelines and that the transactions were settled through actual delivery. Therefore, the loss on share transactions was to be treated as a short-term capital loss and not speculative loss.

Conclusion:

The Third Member agreed with the JM on both issues, leading to the acceptance of the assessee's computation of long-term capital gain and the treatment of the loss on shares' transaction as short-term capital loss. The matter was directed to the regular Bench for a final decision in accordance with the majority opinion.

---