Service tax classification of deposits, land procurement and debentures turned on the true nature of the underlying activity.

Service tax classification turned on the true nature of the activity. Mobilisation of deposits under the Sahara Swarna and Rajat Yojana was treated as prima facie connected to real estate agent service to the extent the scheme contemplated purchase of immovable property on maturity, while reimbursable expenses were not, on the material available, prima facie includible in value. Land procurement charges were treated as prima facie within services in relation to real estate. By contrast, mobilisation of debenture or bond applications and related personalised services to debenture holders were held not prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service, because debentures were treated as actionable claims excluded from the borrowed definition of goods.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether mobilisation of deposits under the Sahara Swarna and Rajat Yojana was prima facie taxable as real estate agent service, (ii) whether land procurement charges were prima facie taxable as real estate agent service, (iii) whether mobilisation of applications for debentures or bonds was prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service, and (iv) whether personalised services rendered to debenture holders were prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service.

Issue (i): whether mobilisation of deposits under the Sahara Swarna and Rajat Yojana was prima facie taxable as real estate agent service.

Analysis: The deposit scheme gave the depositor an option, on maturity, to purchase immovable property, buy products or services, or take cash. The commission was linked to the total deposits mobilised, and the Tribunal held that a portion of the mobilisation was connected with possible purchase of immovable property. It also held that reimbursable expenses were, at least prima facie, not includible in the taxable value on the material then available.

Conclusion: The demand was sustained only to a limited extent on a prima facie basis, and most of the demand under this head was not directed to be pre-deposited.

Issue (ii): whether land procurement charges were prima facie taxable as real estate agent service.

Analysis: The land-related services involved verification of title and related documentation, which fell within the broad ambit of services in relation to real estate. The evidence of non-receipt was not accepted at the stay stage, and the book entries and balance-sheet material were treated as insufficient to negate the demand at that stage.

Conclusion: The demand under this head was held prima facie sustainable.

Issue (iii): whether mobilisation of applications for debentures or bonds was prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service.

Analysis: Business auxiliary service applies to promotion or marketing of goods or services. Debentures were held to be actionable claims, and although actionable claims may be goods in a wider sense, they are excluded from the statutory definition of goods borrowed from the Sale of Goods Act for service tax purposes. On that footing, promotion or mobilisation of debentures was not treated as promotion of goods for business auxiliary service.

Conclusion: The demand under this head was held not sustainable at the prima facie stage.

Issue (iv): whether personalised services rendered to debenture holders were prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service.

Analysis: Since debentures were not treated as goods for the purpose of business auxiliary service, services connected with transfer, redemption, early redemption, conversion, and similar assistance to debenture holders were also outside that category at the prima facie stage.

Conclusion: The demand under this head was held not sustainable at the prima facie stage.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal granted partial relief by directing pre-deposit of the amount attributable to the two sustained heads and staying recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: For service tax classification, the true nature of the activity governs taxation, debentures are not taxable goods for business auxiliary service because they are actionable claims excluded from the borrowed definition of goods, and a stay application may result in partial pre-deposit where only part of the demand is prima facie sustainable.

---