1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Revenue's Stay Application Rejected for Refund Claims under Cenvat Credit Rules</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) ... Refund - claimant was not registered with the department during the period the impugned credit accrued to it - As the claimant was not registered with the department, the impugned refund is not apparently admissible to the respondents - The stay application is rejected The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding three refund claims totaling Rs. 3,37,109/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The claimant was not registered with the department during the period the credit accrued, making the refund inadmissible. The original authority did not raise this issue in the show cause notice, so the impugned order stands. The stay application was rejected.