Revenue's Stay Application Rejected for Refund Claims under Cenvat Credit Rules The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue's Stay Application Rejected for Refund Claims under Cenvat Credit Rules
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding three refund claims totaling Rs. 3,37,109/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The claimant was not registered with the department during the period the credit accrued, making the refund inadmissible. The original authority did not raise this issue in the show cause notice, so the impugned order stands. The stay application was rejected.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding three refund claims totaling Rs. 3,37,109/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The claimant was not registered with the department during the period the credit accrued, making the refund inadmissible. The original authority did not raise this issue in the show cause notice, so the impugned order stands. The stay application was rejected.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
