TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Permission under Section 35 B (2)</h1> The appeal filed by Revenue on 14.7.2005 was found not maintainable due to lacking permission from the Committee of Commissioners as required by section ... Under section 35 B (2) and section 79 - appeal should have been permitted by a Committee of Commissioners - No material to show in accordance with aforesaid provision - The record also does not reveal any document in that regard - appreciate that within two months of the provisions enacted into the law this appeal was filed - According to the provision, appeal is not maintainable - Thus it is dismissed. The appeal filed by Revenue on 14.7.2005 was found to be not maintainable as it did not have the required permission of the Committee of Commissioners as per section 35 B (2) of Central Excise Act 1944. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
