Revenue's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Permission under Section 35 B (2) The appeal filed by Revenue on 14.7.2005 was found not maintainable due to lacking permission from the Committee of Commissioners as required by section ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Permission under Section 35 B (2)
The appeal filed by Revenue on 14.7.2005 was found not maintainable due to lacking permission from the Committee of Commissioners as required by section 35 B (2) of the Central Excise Act 1944. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI.
The appeal filed by Revenue on 14.7.2005 was found to be not maintainable as it did not have the required permission of the Committee of Commissioners as per section 35 B (2) of Central Excise Act 1944. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.