Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was leviable when the finding was that the assessee had committed only a bona fide mistake which was later rectified and there was no intention to evade duty.
Analysis: Penalty under Section 11AC is attracted only where there is deliberate deception or intent to evade duty. The finding recorded by the Tribunal, and affirmed by the High Court, was that the matter involved a bona fide mistake and that there was no intention to evade tax. In light of that finding and the governing principle on Section 11AC, no interference was warranted.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and the appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted in the absence of deliberate deception or intent to evade duty.