Bank's Appeal for Higher Depreciation on EPABX & Mobile Phones Dismissed; Prior Period Expenditure Disallowance Upheld The Kerala HC dismissed the bank's appeal seeking higher depreciation on EPABX and mobile phones, ruling they are not eligible for 60% depreciation as ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Bank's Appeal for Higher Depreciation on EPABX & Mobile Phones Dismissed; Prior Period Expenditure Disallowance Upheld
The Kerala HC dismissed the bank's appeal seeking higher depreciation on EPABX and mobile phones, ruling they are not eligible for 60% depreciation as computers. The Tribunal upheld disallowance of prior period expenditure due to insufficient evidence. The appeal was rejected without finding any substantial question of law.
The Kerala High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-bank regarding higher depreciation claim on EPABX and mobile phones, as they are not considered computers eligible for 60% depreciation. The Tribunal also confirmed disallowance of prior period expenditure due to lack of evidence. The appeal was rejected, and no substantial question of law was found.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.