Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2009 (8) TMI 754 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Penalty for Tax Violation, Emphasizes Compliance The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Penalty for Tax Violation, Emphasizes Compliance

                            The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty. The assessee's failure to substantiate its explanation and lack of bona fide conduct led to the Tribunal's ruling in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of complying with tax laws and providing accurate information.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.
                            2. Concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars.
                            3. Bona fide belief and reasonable cause for not filing the return on time.
                            4. Applicability of Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.
                            5. Mens rea and its relevance in penalty proceedings.
                            6. Eligibility for depreciation on construction work.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act:
                            The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty of Rs. 6,35,060 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The CIT(A) held that the assessee did not conceal particulars of income nor furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal examined whether the deletion of the penalty was justified based on the facts and legal provisions.

                            2. Concealment of Income and Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars:
                            The assessee, a registered trust, did not file its return of income by the due date and filed a nil return in response to a notice under Section 148. The AO assessed an income of Rs. 21,02,720 and initiated penalty proceedings for concealment and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to claim depreciation or provide details of assets, and the surplus indicated taxable income. The AO imposed a penalty, which was deleted by the CIT(A), who found no deliberate defiance of law or dishonest conduct by the assessee.

                            3. Bona Fide Belief and Reasonable Cause for Not Filing the Return on Time:
                            The assessee claimed that it did not file the return on time due to a bona fide belief that its income was exempt under Section 10(20) of the IT Act. The Tribunal considered whether this belief constituted a reasonable cause. The AO did not comment adversely on the reasonable cause pleaded by the assessee, and the Tribunal found that there were bona fide reasons for not furnishing the return under Section 139, thus Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) was not attracted.

                            4. Applicability of Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act:
                            Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) deems a person to have concealed income if they fail to file a return within the specified period without reasonable cause. The Tribunal found that the AO issued a notice under Section 148, which the assessee complied with. Since the AO did not comment adversely on the reasonable cause, Explanation 3 was not applicable.

                            5. Mens Rea and Its Relevance in Penalty Proceedings:
                            The Tribunal discussed the concept of mens rea (guilty mind) in penalty proceedings, noting that the Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Dharamendra Textile Processors held that mens rea is not an essential ingredient for imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal rejected the assessee's reliance on judgments requiring mens rea, as the Supreme Court's decision is binding.

                            6. Eligibility for Depreciation on Construction Work:
                            The assessee argued that if depreciation was allowed on the WDV of assets, there would be no taxable income. However, the AO found that the assessee did not claim depreciation or provide details of assets. The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not substantiate this claim with relevant material or evidence. The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to prove that the explanation was bona fide and upheld the AO's decision to impose the penalty.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the AO's imposition of the penalty, finding that the assessee failed to substantiate its explanation and did not act in a bona fide manner. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found