Unidentified adjudication order held invalid, with remand for fresh hearing and filing of additional documents.

An adjudication order was treated as invalid in law because it did not disclose the name of the person who passed it in the preamble, last page, or elsewhere. On that basis, the order was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, and the assessee was to be given a proper opportunity of hearing and to place subsequently obtained documents before the adjudicating authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication order was invalid for want of identification of the person who purportedly passed it, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication with opportunity to place additional documents on record.

Analysis: The order did not disclose the name of the person who passed it either in the preamble, on the last page, or elsewhere. In the absence of such identification, the order was treated as not a valid order in law. Since relevant documents had subsequently been obtained and were sought to be relied upon, the assessee was to be given an adequate opportunity to produce them before the adjudicating authority.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for passing a fresh order after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing and to place the documents before the adjudicating authority.

---