1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Legal Question</h1> The court upheld the decision of the authorities below, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal question. - [2010] 328 ITR 286 Business Expenditure - disallowance education expenses incurred in respect of a trainee during the course of the appellant's business β Trainee was Directorβs son - expenditure incurred has no nexus with the business of the appellant and the same cannot be allowed under section 37(1) of the Act β appeal dismissed The case of V. D. Doshi & Co. v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal involves an appeal regarding the disallowance of education expenses incurred by the appellant company. The son of one of the directors was sent abroad for studies, and the company claimed these expenses as business-related. The senior counsel for the appellant argued that the expenses were in line with the company's business, while the Revenue's counsel contended that the expenses were not justifiable. The court examined the facts and found that the son was not appointed as a trainee through a proper selection process, and the expenses were incurred due to his familial relation with the director. The court upheld the decision of the authorities below, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal question.