Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, where a partner of the assessee-firm acted as karta of a Hindu undivided family, payments made to him or to the concern connected with him could be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as payments to a partner.
Analysis: The governing principle applied was that section 40(b) permits disallowance only of amounts paid to the partner in that capacity. Where the partner represents a Hindu undivided family, payments attributable to the Hindu undivided family are not to be confused with payments made to the individual partner personally. On that basis, the earlier Full Bench view was followed and the payments in question were not treated as hit by section 40(b).
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.