Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Governor could amend the remuneration payable to the Advocate-General under Article 165 of the Constitution of India and whether the revised fee notification applied to pending fee claims.
Analysis: Article 165 provides that the Advocate-General holds office during the pleasure of the Governor and receives such remuneration as the Governor may determine. The terms of appointment expressly contemplated that they would be governed by rules framed under Article 165 as amended from time to time. The office is essentially one of advocate and client in relation to court work, and the fee structure fixed under the earlier notification was not immutable. The revised notification rationalised fees for batch matters and cases covered by earlier judgments, and there was no legal basis to insist that the earlier scale must continue unchanged during the appellant's tenure. The amendment did not suffer from want of competence merely because it altered the fee arrangement.
Conclusion: The revised notification was valid and the appellant was bound to submit revised bills in accordance with it.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the merits, and the appellant's entitlement was restricted to payment computed under the amended fee notification together with interest as directed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing terms of appointment under Article 165 contemplate amendment from time to time, the remuneration of an Advocate-General may be altered by the competent authority and the revised fee structure can govern pending claims.