Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal constituted under Section 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is a Court subordinate to the High Court for the purposes of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, so as to permit transfer of proceedings from one Tribunal to another.
Analysis: The distinction between a Court and a Tribunal was examined in the context of the judicial power exercised by both, the ordinary hierarchy of civil courts, and the special jurisdiction of tribunals. The earlier view that the Claims Tribunal was not a Court was reconsidered in light of the Supreme Court's later pronouncement treating such a Tribunal as a Civil Court for transfer purposes under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Once the Tribunal was treated as a Civil Court, it followed that it was subordinate to the High Court within the territorial hierarchy contemplated by Section 24. The fact that the presiding officer is described as District Judge or that the forum is created for special claims did not prevent the Tribunal from being a Court for this purpose.
Conclusion: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is a Court subordinate to the High Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and transfer of the claim petition from one Tribunal to another is permissible.