Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1963 (10) TMI 40 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Limitation Period on Assessments: voluntary-return assessments barred absent prima facie concealment; notices quashed and further assessment restrained. Assessments founded on voluntary returns are subject to the statutory limitation period and cannot be validly completed beyond the prescribed limitation ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Limitation Period on Assessments: voluntary-return assessments barred absent prima facie concealment; notices quashed and further assessment restrained.

                          Assessments founded on voluntary returns are subject to the statutory limitation period and cannot be validly completed beyond the prescribed limitation absent a prima facie basis to treat the return as concealed or containing inaccurate particulars; where earlier assessments did not invoke the concealment clause and the record shows no prima facie concealment, extension of limitation is impermissible and assessments become time-barred. Notices and penalty proceedings issued without any showing of concealment or reliance on the concealment ground amount to harassment and are quashed, with a mandamus restraining further assessment on the voluntary returns.




                          Issues: (i) Whether an assessment under section 23 based on voluntary returns can be validly completed beyond the normal four-year limitation in section 34(3) unless there is a prima facie case attracting clause (c) of section 28(1); (ii) Whether notices under section 22(4), section 28(1)(a) and section 46(5A) and continuing assessment action after lapse of limitation should be quashed/restrained.

                          Issue (i): Whether assessments on voluntary returns are time-barred where more than four years have elapsed and no notice under section 28(1)(c) was issued or there is no prima facie case of concealment.

                          Analysis: The statutory scheme provides a normal four-year period for completion of assessments under section 34(3). Clause (c) of section 28(1) extends limitation only where concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars is shown to be applicable. Where an earlier assessment under section 23(4) was made without invoking section 28(1)(c) and was subsequently set aside, the assessing officer, to proceed beyond the four-year period, must demonstrate at least a prima facie basis for invoking section 28(1)(c). Absent any action under section 28(1)(c) during the pendency of the earlier assessment and absent any indication on the record of concealment or inaccurate particulars, permitting indefinite postponement of assessment would nullify the statutory limitation and permit harassment.

                          Conclusion: The Court holds that, in the absence of a prima facie case invoking section 28(1)(c), an assessment under section 23 based on voluntary returns is time-barred after the four-year period in section 34(3). This conclusion is in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the notices issued under section 22(4), section 28(1)(a) and section 46(5A) and further assessment action should be quashed or restrained in the facts of the case.

                          Analysis: The notices under section 46(5A) and the penalty notices under section 28(1)(a) were issued while there was no showing that section 28(1)(c) applied, and the department filed no counter-affidavit disputing the allegations of harassment or alleging concealment. The assessing officer did not decide the limitation point nor indicate reliance on clause (c) of section 28(1). Given the absence of any prima facie justification to extend limitation and the Tribunal's cancellation of the earlier assessment, continuation of proceedings would amount to harassment and fall outside the officer's jurisdiction.

                          Conclusion: The Court quashes the notices under section 22(4), section 28(1)(a) and section 46(5A) and issues a mandamus restraining further assessment on the voluntary returns; this conclusion is in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The overall effect is that the assessing officer is barred from proceeding with fresh assessments based on the voluntary returns where more than four years have elapsed and no prima facie case for invoking section 28(1)(c) exists; the departmental notices impugned are quashed and further assessment is restrained.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessing officer has not invoked section 28(1)(c) and there is no prima facie evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, the statutory four-year limitation in section 34(3) applies and assessments on voluntary returns cannot be validly completed beyond that period.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found