Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Kara-samadhana Scheme of 2017 in respect of the penalty levied under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, and whether the authority was bound to accept and process the application under the Scheme on payment of 10% of the penalty.
Analysis: Clause 1.2 of the Scheme covered arrears of penalty and interest arising under the KST and CST laws for the relevant period, and the period in question included the default relating to March 2015. Clause 2.3 required payment of only 10% of the arrears, with the balance liable to be waived. The refusal to extend the Scheme benefit was therefore unjustified, and the petitioner's application was required to be accepted and processed in accordance with the Scheme.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the respondent was directed to accept the application under the Scheme, subject to payment of 10% of the penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory amnesty or settlement scheme expressly covers arrears of penalty and interest for the relevant period, the authority must extend the scheme benefit and process the application in accordance with its terms.