TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after appellants and counsel failed to remove outstanding office objections and did not appear</h1> Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by HC where appellants and their counsel failed to remove office objections despite being given time and did not ... Non-compliance of office objections - HELD THAT:- In spite of granting sufficient time, neither the appellants nor the counsel for the appellants have removed the office objections. Two months have lapsed after the order dated 22-01-2010 and till now the office objections have not been removed nor the appellants represented before the court today. Therefore, there is no other option but to dismiss the appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the case. Order accordingly. The Karnataka High Court dismissed an income tax appeal under section 206-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to non-prosecution by the appellants for not complying with office objections despite sufficient time granted. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants were not diligent in prosecuting the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
