TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court affirms limited timeframe for Labour Court to set aside ex parte awards</h1> <h3>Sangham Tape Company Versus Hans Raj</h3> The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the limited timeframe for the Labour Court to set aside an ex parte award. The Court ... - Issues:1. Jurisdiction of Labour Court to set aside an ex parte award.2. Applicability of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to industrial adjudication.3. Timeframe for filing an application to set aside an award.4. Effect of Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on the jurisdiction of Labour Court.5. Interpretation of previous judgments regarding the timeframe for setting aside an award.Issue 1: Jurisdiction of Labour Court to set aside an ex parte award:The case involved an appeal against a High Court judgment setting aside an ex parte award by the Labour Court. The respondent filed a writ petition questioning the Labour Court's order setting aside the award. The appellant contended that the Labour Court had jurisdiction to set aside the award beyond 30 days from its publication if sufficient cause was shown. The appellant relied on the case of Anil Sood v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court II to support this argument.Issue 2: Applicability of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to industrial adjudication:The appellant argued that industrial adjudication is governed by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the rules framed thereunder may apply the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellant contended that the Labour Court's jurisdiction to set aside an ex parte award should not be limited to 30 days from the date of publication of the award.Issue 3: Timeframe for filing an application to set aside an award:The Supreme Court referred to the case of Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal, highlighting that an application to set aside an award must be filed within 30 days of its publication. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal retains jurisdiction over the dispute until the award becomes enforceable under Section 17A of the Act.Issue 4: Effect of Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on the jurisdiction of Labour Court:The Court clarified that once an award becomes enforceable under Section 17A of the Act, the Labour Court loses jurisdiction to set it aside. The Labour Court becomes functus officio after the expiry of 30 days from the date of publication of the award.Issue 5: Interpretation of previous judgments regarding the timeframe for setting aside an award:The Court discussed previous cases like Satnam Verma v. Union of India and J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, following the principles established in Grindlays Bank case. The Court rejected the appellant's argument based on Anil Sood case, stating that each case's facts and circumstances must be considered independently. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the Labour Court's jurisdiction to set aside an award is limited to a specific timeframe as per Section 17A of the Act.In conclusion, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the limited timeframe for the Labour Court to set aside an ex parte award. The Court clarified that the Labour Court's jurisdiction ends once the award becomes enforceable under Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The judgment reiterated the importance of timely applications to set aside awards and highlighted the precedents supporting this legal principle.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
