Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court directs Tribunal to reconsider issues, rules interest income as business income eligible for deduction.</h1> <h3>M/s. Mutholy Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4, Kottayam.</h3> M/s. Mutholy Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4, Kottayam. - TMI Issues:- Applicability of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961- Interpretation of Circular No. 18/2015 dated 02.11.2015- Treatment of interest income received by the assesseeAnalysis:1. Applicability of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The initial dispute revolved around the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80P (2) (a) (i) of the Act on interest income received, which was denied on the grounds that the interest income did not qualify as business income. The Tribunal, following the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Totgar's Co-operative Society Ltd vs. ITO, held that the interest income from fixed deposits could not be considered as business income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). However, upon appeal to the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, it was directed that all issues, including the applicability of Circular No. 18/2015 and the judgment in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., be reconsidered by the Tribunal.2. Interpretation of Circular No. 18/2015 dated 02.11.2015:Circular No. 18/2015 clarified the treatment of interest income from non-SLR securities of banks, emphasizing that such income should be considered under the head 'Profits and gains of business and profession' if the investments are part of the banking business. The circular highlighted the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Nawanshahar Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., stating that income from investments made by banking concerns is attributable to the business of banking. This clarification was deemed applicable to cooperative societies/banks claiming deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), aligning with the judgment in the case of CIT vs. Nawanshahar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. The Tribunal, considering the circular and previous decisions, concluded that interest earnings of the assessee, a primary agricultural credit society, should be treated as income from business and not from other sources, thus making them eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).3. Treatment of interest income received by the assessee:The Tribunal, after revisiting the issues as per the directions of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, acknowledged that the assessee's interest income from deposits placed in Sub-Treasury and banks should be eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. This decision was supported by the interpretation of Circular No. 18/2015 and previous judgments, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal and the favorable outcome in their favor.In conclusion, the Tribunal, guided by the directives of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, reevaluated the applicability of Section 80P, the interpretation of Circular No. 18/2015, and the treatment of interest income, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal based on the eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found