1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Spouse's income not included in total income, but children's income from partnership firm should be.</h1> The High Court of Madras held that the spouse's income should not be added to the assessee's total income, but minor children's income from a partnership ... HUF Income, HUF Partner In Firm, Inclusions In Total Income, Income Of HUF, Income Tax Act, Minor Child The High Court of Madras ruled on tax cases involving the inclusion of spouse's income and minor children's income from a partnership firm in the assessee's total income. The court held that the spouse's income should not be added to the assessee's total income, citing a Supreme Court decision. However, the minor children's income from partnership benefits should be included in the assessee's total income under section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, even if the parent is not a partner in the firm. The court disposed of the tax cases with no costs.