Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CESTAT Upholds Interest Demands on Service Tax Amounts, Rejects Plea for Leniency</h1> <h3>SREE VADIVAMBIGAI TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MADURAI</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) upheld demands of interest on service tax amounts for specific periods under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, ... Service Tax – Interest for delayed payment – BFIR declared that sick industry is no ground for easygoingness in demand for interest The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) upheld demands of interest on service tax amounts of Rs. 41,917/- and Rs 20,400/- for specific periods under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants' plea for leniency due to being declared sick by BIFR was rejected as Section 75 provisions are mandatory, leaving no scope for leniency. The appeals were rejected.