Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (8) TMI 1286 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal restores commission disallowance, remands partner remuneration for verification The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by restoring the AO's disallowance of commission due to lack of evidence establishing the services ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal restores commission disallowance, remands partner remuneration for verification

                          The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by restoring the AO's disallowance of commission due to lack of evidence establishing the services rendered, and remanding the issue of partner remuneration for fresh verification. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the disallowance of interest, business promotion expenses, and disallowance under section 14A due to the absence of exempt income.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deletion of disallowance of commission.
                          2. Deletion of disallowance of remuneration paid to partners.
                          3. Deletion of disallowance of interest.
                          4. Deletion of disallowance of business promotion expenses.
                          5. Deletion of disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deletion of Disallowance of Commission:
                          The Revenue challenged the deletion of a Rs. 2,50,000/- disallowance made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of commission paid to M/s. Rex Agro Pvt. Limited. The AO disallowed the commission due to lack of evidence proving the genuineness and details of sales made through the sister concern. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, citing that the commission was paid by account payee cheque, accounted for by M/s. Rex Agro Pvt. Ltd. in its income tax return, and tax deducted at source. The CIT(A) emphasized the principle of consistency as the commission payment was allowed in previous years. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the services rendered by M/s. Rex Agro Pvt. Limited and restored the AO's disallowance, emphasizing that the expenditure was not proven to be wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

                          2. Deletion of Disallowance of Remuneration Paid to Partners:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 2,40,000/- paid as remuneration to partners under section 40A(2)(b) due to the absence of a clause in the Partnership Deed. The assessee produced a supplementary deed before the CIT(A), who allowed the claim. The Tribunal noted that the supplementary deed was filed for the first time before the CIT(A) without giving the AO an opportunity to verify it, violating Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the AO for fresh verification.

                          3. Deletion of Disallowance of Interest:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 29,16,399/- on account of interest, citing diversion of borrowed funds for non-business purposes, specifically interest-free advances to sister concerns. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, relying on the Calcutta High Court's decision in CIT vs. Britannia Industries Ltd., which supported the presumption that advances made from mixed accounts are from the assessee’s own funds. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the assessee had sufficient own funds to cover the advances and that borrowed funds were used for business purposes.

                          4. Deletion of Disallowance of Business Promotion Expenses:
                          The AO made a 20% ad hoc disallowance of business promotion expenses amounting to Rs. 5,80,241/- due to lack of proper bills/vouchers. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, stating that the AO did not point out any specific defects. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no infirmity as the AO failed to provide specific instances of unverifiable expenses.

                          5. Deletion of Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 1,18,942/- under section 14A read with Rule 8D, attributing it to expenses related to investments in shares, despite no dividend income being earned. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, referencing judicial pronouncements that disallowance under section 14A cannot be made in the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that no disallowance can be made when no exempt income is earned.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal, restoring the AO's disallowance of commission and remanding the issue of partner remuneration for fresh verification, while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on interest, business promotion expenses, and section 14A disallowance.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found