TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue appeal dismissed for misdeclaration affecting assessable value. Officer's failure noted.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed Revenue's appeal due to misdeclaration causing prejudice in determining assessable value. The officer's ... Valuation - determination of assessable value - Instead of providing the entire cost data, the respondents provided only overhead expenses of the second half of the year stating that to be ₹ 75.02 per kg. while the actual factory overhead was ₹ 106.20 per kg. - Held that: - we are not able to understand from the facts of the present case as to whether the officer conducting his adjudication has applied his mind in good faith to law. If he fails to discharge his duty under law, having his own scope to call for entire details, it is very difficult to appreciate the Revenue’s case after twelve years - appeal dismissed - decided against revenue. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed Revenue's appeal due to misdeclaration causing prejudice in determining assessable value. The officer's failure to apply his mind in good faith was highlighted, referencing the Nizam Sugar Factory case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
