Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Dispensation granted for Scheme of Arrangement under Companies Act</h1> <h3>In Re: Chemtura Chemicals India Private Limited AND Arysta LifeScience India Limited</h3> The Court granted dispensation from convening meetings for the approval of the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the Companies ... Scheme of Arrangement - dispensation of meetings - requirement of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors - Held that:- The Board of Directors of the applicant/transferor company and the transferee company in their separate meetings held on 27th August, 2015 and 26th August, 2015 respectively have unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. Copies of the Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of applicant/transferor company and the transferee company have been placed on record. The applicant/transferor company has 02 equity shareholders and 28 unsecured creditors. Both the equity shareholders and 16 out of 28 unsecured creditors, being 57.14% in number and 80% in value, have given their consents/no objections in writing to the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. There consents/no objections have been placed on record. They have been examined and found in order. In view thereof, the requirement of convening the meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant/transferor company, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is dispensed with. There is no secured creditor of the applicant/transferor company, as on 31st August, 2015. Issues:Application under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking dispensation of meetings for Scheme of Arrangement approval.Analysis:1. Jurisdiction and Background: The applicant, a transferor company, sought directions under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings of equity shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Arrangement with a transferee company. The transferor company was originally incorporated in Maharashtra but later shifted its registered office to Delhi.2. Capital Structure and Documents: The transferor company had an authorized share capital of Rs. 1,00,00,00,000 divided into 1,00,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 100 each, with an issued and paid-up capital of Rs. 97,85,36,700. The Memorandum and Articles of Association of both companies, along with the audited balance sheet of the transferor company, were submitted.3. Scheme of Arrangement: The proposed Scheme aimed at creating a larger company with increased resources and capital base for business expansion. It was projected to result in economies of scale, reduced overheads, administrative work, and enhanced resource utilization. The share exchange ratio under the Scheme was detailed as 50 equity shares of Rs. 10 each in the transferee company for every 233 equity shares of Rs. 100 each held in the transferor company.4. Compliance and Approval: The Board of Directors of both companies unanimously approved the Scheme in separate meetings. The transferor company had 02 equity shareholders and 28 unsecured creditors, with consents from the majority obtained. 57.14% of shareholders and 80% of creditors by value provided written consents, dispensing with the need for formal meetings. No secured creditors were identified as of the relevant date.5. Decision: Considering the compliance with procedural requirements and approvals obtained, the Court allowed the application, granting dispensation from convening meetings for the approval of the Scheme of Arrangement. The judgment was delivered in favor of the applicant transferor company, facilitating the implementation of the proposed Scheme.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found