Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the District Consumer Forums, State Commissions, and the National Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have the power to recall, set aside, or review their own ex parte orders.
Analysis: The Consumer fora are statutory tribunals and can exercise only such powers as are expressly conferred by the Act. Section 13(4) confers limited civil-court powers for specified purposes, and the scheme of Sections 12, 13, 17, 22, and 22A shows that the legislature specifically conferred review and ex parte-setting-aside power on the National Commission, while not extending the same power to the District Forums or State Commissions. The later view treating such fora as having inherent power to restore matters dismissed for default was held inconsistent with the statutory scheme and legislative intention. The amendment introducing Section 22A was understood as a deliberate conferment of the power only on the National Commission.
Conclusion: The District Forums and State Commissions do not have power to recall, set aside, or review their own ex parte orders. The contrary view was rejected, and the statutory power is confined to the National Commission as provided by the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: A consumer forum, being a creature of statute, cannot assume inherent power to review or recall its own ex parte order unless such power is expressly conferred by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.