Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court approves shares transfer, revival scheme for company, emphasizing public interest and financial viability.</h1> <h3>Wearwell Cycle Company India Limited Versus AK Misra And Brahm Arenja</h3> The court validated the transfer of shares and credits to M/s. Misra and Arenja, approving their revival scheme for the company. The court emphasized the ... - Issues Involved:1. Validity of the transfer of shares and credits.2. Approval of the revival scheme for the company.3. Compliance with statutory requirements.4. Representation and voting rights of creditors and shareholders.5. Financial viability and public interest of the proposed scheme.6. Role and authority of the Chairman in the meetings.7. Objections raised by Mr. H.L. Seth.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of the Transfer of Shares and Credits:The court validated the transfer of shares and credits to M/s. Misra and Arenja. It was held that 'the agreement was entered into bona fide and in the interest of the company.' The court also noted that 'Seth did not challenge the agreement at all' and that 'Misra and Arenja stepped into the shoes of the Bank' after settling with the Punjab National Bank.2. Approval of the Revival Scheme for the Company:The court sanctioned the scheme proposed by M/s. Misra and Arenja, as modified by Resolution No. 1, and rejected the schemes proposed by Kelvinator and Mr. H.L. Seth. The court emphasized that 'the revival of the company is in public interest' and that 'Misra and Arenja have already contributed approximately Rs. 40 lakhs in this venture.'3. Compliance with Statutory Requirements:The court ensured that the statutory requirements were met, noting that 'the statement of affairs as required under Sub-s. (1) of S. 454 of the Act was filed giving the details of the debts and liabilities of the company.' The court also directed the Official Liquidator to 'substitute the names of M/s. A. K. Misra and Brahm Arenja and their nominees as per the transfer deeds in place of the members.'4. Representation and Voting Rights of Creditors and Shareholders:The court addressed the objections regarding the voting rights and representation of creditors and shareholders. It was held that 'the correct method would be that when a person acquires or buys the credits of a number of creditors, he merely steps into their shoes.' The court found that 'the Scheme was approved by over 95% of the total shares represented at the meeting.'5. Financial Viability and Public Interest of the Proposed Scheme:The court found the scheme proposed by M/s. Misra and Arenja to be financially viable and in the public interest. The court noted that 'Misra and Arenja are men of sufficient means and financial resources' and that 'the Scheme is in the interest of the company, its creditors, as well as shareholders.'6. Role and Authority of the Chairman in the Meetings:The court addressed the objections regarding the Chairman's role and authority. It was held that 'the Chairman should not have travelled beyond what was ordered by court in this connection' and that 'the Chairman's report has not been enclosed with the present petition and therefore the present petition has not been filed as per the requirement of Rule 40 of the Company Court Rules.'7. Objections Raised by Mr. H.L. Seth:The court rejected the objections raised by Mr. H.L. Seth, noting that 'the objections being raised by Mr. Seth in the light of the facts which have come to light in the course of hearing cannot be accepted as bona fide.' The court also stated that 'Mr. Seth has already sold practically all his shareholding of the Seth Group as well as their credits in favour of Misra and Arenja and their associates.'Conclusion:The court allowed C.P. 131 of 1988 in terms of the above order, and C.A. 1082 of 1987 was partly allowed. Other C.As. 2083/88, 7626/89, 13375/89, 130/90, 328/90, 414/85, and 94/87 were dismissed. The court directed that 'the order dated 9th March, 1978 in C.P. 54/77 for winding up of this company be and is hereby recalled and cancelled subject to the aforesaid directions.'

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found