TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SEBI Act Penalties Quashed, Upheld for Breaches</h1> <h3>Concord Realty Private Limited and Ors. Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India</h3> Concord Realty Private Limited and Ors. Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India - TMI Issues:Violation of SEBI Act, 1992 and related regulations - Disclosure obligations under Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 and 2011, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992, failure to furnish information, and failure to appear before the enquiry officer.Detailed Analysis:1. Violation of Disclosure Obligations under SEBI Regulations:The appellants challenged the penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Officer of SEBI for violating the provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992, and related regulations. The issue revolved around whether the appellants were liable for penalties under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act for breaching the disclosure obligations under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 and 2011, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. The appellants argued that the issuance of shares by Mahan Industries Limited (MIL) in two tranches caused their shareholding to exceed 5%, triggering the disclosure requirements. However, the Tribunal found that the appellants had subscribed to convertible equity warrants with the intention of maintaining a shareholding below 5%. As there was no indication that their shareholding would exceed 5% due to the tranches, the failure to disclose during the relevant period could not be attributed to the appellants. Consequently, the penalties under section 15A(b) for violating the regulations were quashed and set aside.2. Failure to Furnish Information and Appear Before SEBI:The appellants were also penalized for violating section 11C(3) and section 11C(5) of the SEBI Act for failing to provide requested information and appear before the enquiry officer, respectively. The appellants contended that there was a misunderstanding regarding the deadline for submitting the documents requested by SEBI, arguing against the imposition of penalties. However, the Tribunal held that the failure to furnish the required particulars and appear before the SEBI officer constituted violations of the SEBI Act. The penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Officer, amounting to Rs. 2 lakh each for the violations of section 11C(3) and section 11C(5), were deemed reasonable and upheld. The appellants were directed to pay the penalties within six weeks to settle the claims under the impugned order.3. Conclusion:In conclusion, the Tribunal quashed the penalties imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act for violating the SEBI regulations related to disclosure obligations. However, the penalties under section 15A(a) for breaching section 11C(3) and section 11C(5) of the SEBI Act were upheld. The appellants were instructed to pay the respective penalties within six weeks, failing which SEBI would be entitled to recover the amounts with interest. The appeals were disposed of with no costs awarded.
TaxTMI 