1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules combined flats as self-occupied, nullifying second flat's annual value</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that both adjacent flats used as one house should be considered self-occupied, resulting in a Nil annual value for ... - Issues involved: Appeal against the order of CIT(A) regarding taxation of notional value of second flat and annual market value determination.Issue 1 - Taxation of notional value of second flat:The assessee owned two adjacent flats used as one house, both self-occupied. The Assessing Officer estimated the annual valuation of the second flat without considering the combined use of both flats. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, distinguishing a similar case of combined flats. The Tribunal held that since both flats were used as one unit, they should be considered self-occupied, rejecting the CIT(A)'s reasoning based on the location of the flats. Consequently, the annual value of the second flat was deemed Nil, and the appeal was allowed.Issue 2 - Determination of annual market value:The Assessing Officer determined the annual value of the second flat based on market rent information received from the society, resulting in a higher valuation than the municipal rateable value offered by the assessee. The assessee argued for a lower valuation based on municipal rateable value. However, the Tribunal's decision on the first issue rendered this point moot, as the second flat was considered self-occupied with a Nil annual value.This judgment highlights the importance of considering the actual use of property in determining tax liability and the relevance of treating combined units as a single entity for taxation purposes.