Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Petitioner allowed to withdraw special leave petition; case dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel present.</h1> <h3>Pramod Mittal and anr. Versus GL Asia Mauritius II Ltd. and ors.</h3> The Supreme Court of India allowed the petitioner to withdraw the special leave petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn. Both parties' ... Temporary injunction - Restriction on transferability of the equity shares holding by the Opposite Party No. 1 under the said agreement - Held that:- HC has held since this Court does not find the existence of a prima facie case having made out in application for temporary injunction in view of the findings recorded hereinabove, there is no infirmity and / or illegality in the impugned order by which an application for temporary injunction is rejected by this Trial Court. [2015 (10) TMI 2659 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the special leave petition. Permission sought for is granted. The Supreme Court of India in 2016 (3) TMI 1244 - SC Order, with Justices V. Gopala Gowda and Arun Mishra, allowed the petitioner to withdraw the special leave petition, which was then dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel for both parties were present during the proceedings.