TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of the taxpayer's finger operation was deductible in computing profits, being expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of his profession, or whether it was disallowed as expenditure incurred for a dual purpose and partly for private or hobby purposes.
Analysis: The governing test under section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1952 is whether the expenditure is wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the trade, profession or vocation, and whether it is distinct from domestic or private expenditure. The facts showed that the taxpayer underwent the operation not merely to restore a professional tool of work, but also to continue playing the guitar as a hobby. The finding of the commissioners was that the operation enabled him to continue to play the guitar not solely professionally but equally to continue to enjoy and practise it as a hobby. That amounted to a finding of dual purpose. Where expenditure is incurred partly for business and partly for a private or hobby purpose, it cannot satisfy the statutory test of exclusive business purpose.
Conclusion: The medical expense was not deductible. It was incurred for a dual purpose and fell outside the allowance for money wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the profession.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure is deductible only if its sole object is the purposes of the trade or profession; if it serves both a professional purpose and a separate private or hobby purpose, it is not wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the profession.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
