Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was liable to pre-deposit the demanded amount in a dispute concerning classification of the business arrangement as taxable service, and whether interim waiver and stay were warranted.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the appellant and its co-venturer were carrying on a joint business activity with sharing of profits and losses in the ratio of 75:25. On that prima facie view, the arrangement did not appear to be one of promotion or marketing on commission basis. The appellant was therefore found to have a strong case on merits for interim relief.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeal.