Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State had legislative competence to levy and enhance permit fee under Rule 22 of the Punjab Liquor Permit and Pass Rules, 1932 on denatured spirit used as industrial alcohol, and whether the impugned notification enhancing the fee was valid.
Analysis: Denatured spirit, being industrial alcohol and not alcoholic liquor for human consumption, falls outside the State's regulatory field so far as levy of such permit fee is concerned. The Constitution Bench and later authority relied upon in the judgment recognised that the State may regulate to prevent diversion of industrial alcohol into potable liquor, but its power ends with denaturation and does not extend to controlling denatured spirit as such. The levy under Rule 22, as amended, was therefore treated as an impermissible impost on an area beyond the State's competence.
Conclusion: The levy and its enhancement on denatured spirit were held invalid and unsustainable, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A State cannot levy permit fee on denatured spirit, since industrial alcohol is not alcoholic liquor for human consumption and State regulatory power does not extend beyond denaturation.