Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST could be denied on the ground that drawback had been claimed on the specified services used for export of goods.
Analysis: The refund claim was rejected solely because drawback had been claimed on specified services. The Tribunal noted that the services in question were received after manufacture of the goods and were not included while calculating the drawback claim. Relying on the earlier Tribunal decision in Mittal International, it held that the drawback rules were not applicable to such input services used for export of goods.
Conclusion: The refund claim could not be rejected on the ground of drawback, and the assessee was held entitled to the refund.
Ratio Decidendi: Drawback rules cannot be invoked to deny refund of service tax on input services used for export of goods where those services are not part of the drawback computation.