Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether annual payments made by a foreign company to the widow of its former employee, in recognition of the employee's past services and at the discretion of the company, constituted taxable income in the widow's hands.
Analysis: The payments were made after the employee's death, not under any agreement or legal obligation, and not as remuneration for services rendered by the widow. The allowance was granted voluntarily by the company as a recurring widow's pension, but the court found that the deceased employee's services had already been fully dealt with and that no nexus existed between those services and any enforceable right in the widow. A periodic receipt is not income merely because it is recurrent; it must still arise from a real source capable of being characterised as income under the Act. On the facts, the payment was gratuitous and in the nature of a gift, not assessable as income.
Conclusion: The annual allowance was not taxable as income in the hands of the assessee and the reference was answered against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A recurring voluntary payment made ex gratia to the widow of a deceased employee, without any legal obligation or contractual nexus and not referable to services rendered by the recipient, is not income chargeable to tax merely because it is periodic and arises from a perceived source of bounty.