1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court rules in favor of assessee in capital gains case, sets fair market value at Rs. 1,35,000.</h1> The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in a capital gains case, holding that the Assessing Officer's fair market value was unjustified. ... Industrial Undertaking The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the computation of capital gains from the sale of a property. The court held that the fair market value determined by the Assessing Officer was not justified, and the sale price of Rs. 1,35,000 should be adopted for calculating capital gains. The court referred to the interpretation of section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act and a Supreme Court decision to support its ruling. The judgment was delivered by Judges Thanikkachalam and R. Jayasimha Babu.