Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal lay against an order refusing to condone delay in filing an application for continuation of registration under section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the Tribunal was right in holding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to be wrong in granting relief.
Analysis: The question was answered by following the Supreme Court's settled position that an appeal is maintainable from an order rejecting an application for registration or continuation of registration filed beyond time on the ground that sufficient cause was not shown for the delay. On that basis, the appellate order granting condonation of delay and continuation of registration was treated as legally sustainable.
Conclusion: The reference was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An appeal lies against an order rejecting, on limitation grounds, an application for registration or continuation of registration where the applicant seeks condonation of delay on the basis of sufficient cause.