Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Income Tax Appeal Upheld: Indexation of Tenancy Rights Cost Valid for 2007-08 Assessment Year</h1> The Revenue's appeal challenging the indexation on the cost of acquisition of tenancy rights under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 was ... Indexation on cost of acquisition of the tenancy rights as on 1.4.1981 - capital gain on transfer of capital asset acquired by the assessee from the previous owner - cost of acquisition of tenancy rights acquired by the previous owner i.e., father of the assessee without any cost in the year 1973 is stood itself at Nil to the assessee as on 1.4.1981 - Held that:- We find that there is no infirmity in the finding and the conclusion drawn by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) as now in wake of decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in Manjula J. Shah (2011 (10) TMI 406 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT) it is quite settled that while computing the capital gain arising out of transfer of capital asset acquired by the assessee from the previous owner, the index cost of acquisition has to be computed with reference to the year in which the previous owner first held the asset and not the year in which the assessee became the owner of the asset. Here in this case, it is undisputed fact that the tenancy right was acquired by his father much before 1st April 1981, and the assessee became the owner on distribution of assets on dissolution of the firm in view of section 49(1)(iii)(b), therefore, the cost of acquisition has rightly been held to be adopted from 1st April 1981. Thus, the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is affirmed and the ground raised by the Department is dismissed. Issues Involved:Challenge to indexation on cost of acquisition of tenancy rights under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08.Analysis:The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the quantum of assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08. The main contention raised was regarding the indexation on the cost of acquisition of tenancy rights acquired by the assessee's father without any cost in 1973, which the Revenue argued should be considered as nil cost to the assessee as of 1st April 1981. The assessee sold the tenanted property during the year and claimed long term capital gain on surrender of the tenancy rights. The Assessing Officer rejected the inflated cost of index at a certain amount, stating that no cost had been incurred by the assessee in the acquisition of tenancy rights. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the indexation based on the fair market value as on 1st April 1981, following the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in a specific case. The Commissioner held that the tenancy right was acquired much before 1981, and thus the value had to be adopted as on 1st April 1981. The index cost of acquisition was deemed to be the cost for which the previous owner had acquired the property. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and the previous order, affirmed the Commissioner's decision based on the settled principle that the index cost of acquisition should be computed with reference to the year in which the previous owner first held the asset. As the tenancy right was acquired by the father before 1981, the cost of acquisition was rightly held to be adopted from 1st April 1981. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the Commissioner's order was upheld.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found