Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal affirms exemption for pre-pregs under CETH 3926.90, dismisses appeal on marketability.</h1> <h3>Commr. of Cus., C. Ex. & S.T., Hyderabad-IV Versus Lamtuf Plastics Ltd.</h3> Commr. of Cus., C. Ex. & S.T., Hyderabad-IV Versus Lamtuf Plastics Ltd. - 2016 (343) E.L.T. 618 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues involved:Classification of pre-pregs under Notification No. 8/96-C.E., marketability of pre-pregs, reliance on legal precedents, classification under CETH 3926.90, applicability of exemption notification, acceptance of classification by appellant, distinction between sheets and sheetings, marketability issue.Detailed Analysis:Classification of pre-pregs under Notification No. 8/96-C.E.:The appellant claimed exemption under Notification No. 8/96-C.E. for fabric based laminates and articles of plastics. The Revenue contested this claim, alleging that the pre-pregs manufactured by the appellant were in sheet form and marketable, thus not qualifying for the claimed exemption. The Commissioner initially dropped the proceedings, upholding the appellant's classification. The Revenue appealed this decision, arguing that the pre-pregs were marketable sheets and should not be exempted under the notification.Reliance on Legal Precedents:The appellant relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE v. Wood Polymers Ltd. to support their classification of pre-pregs as sheetings. However, the Revenue cited the case of Nanya Imports and Exports Enterprises v. CCE, Chennai, where the Tribunal discussed the distinction between 'sheet' and 'sheetings' in the context of classification. The Tribunal's decision in Nanya case emphasized that items in rolled form should be considered sheetings, not sheets cut to size.Classification under CETH 3926.90 and Applicability of Exemption Notification:The Tribunal analyzed the classification of pre-pregs in roll form, comparing it to similar cases like Nanya Imports & Exports. The Commissioner accepted the appellant's claim that pre-pregs were cleared in roll form, falling under CETH 3926.90. The Tribunal noted that exemption from duty was available under Notification No. 8/96-C.E. for products classified under CETH 3926.90, with no contradictory submissions on this issue.Acceptance of Classification and Distinction between Sheets and Sheetings:The Tribunal considered the appellant's acceptance of the classification and previous decisions regarding cotton fabric laminates. The Commissioner observed that the impugned goods were cleared in roll form, not sheet form, aligning with the classification under CETH 3926.90. The distinction between sheets and sheetings was crucial in determining the correct classification, supported by Note 10 to Chapter 39 of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Marketability Issue:Although the appellants raised the marketability issue, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to address it due to the clear classification of pre-pregs. The decision to dismiss the Revenue's appeal was based on the observations regarding classification, acceptance of claims, and lack of contradictory evidence or superior forum decisions.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, legal arguments, reliance on precedents, and the Tribunal's reasoning behind the decision to uphold the classification of pre-pregs under CETH 3926.90 and the applicability of the exemption notification.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found