Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether reassessment proceedings under Section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were validly initiated; (ii) whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 40% on vehicles leased out to third parties.
Issue (i): Whether reassessment proceedings under Section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were validly initiated.
Analysis: The record showed that depreciation had been allowed in earlier and subsequent years, and the original assessment for the year in question was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. No new material or information had come to the notice of the Assessing Officer to justify the belief that income had escaped assessment.
Conclusion: Reassessment was not validly initiated; the action was barred as a mere change of opinion.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 40% on vehicles leased out to third parties.
Analysis: The Court followed its earlier view that an assessee is entitled to higher depreciation on leased vehicles used in the business of running them on hire, including where such use is by third parties.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation at 40% on the leased vehicles.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed in full.