Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were liable to be set aside for want of the personal hearing contemplated under Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The writ petitions challenged the assessment orders on the ground that the petitioners had specifically requested a personal hearing and that the adverse orders were passed without affording such opportunity. The record showed written requests seeking hearing if the authority was not satisfied with the replies. The respondent was unable to clarify whether the statutory opportunity of personal hearing had in fact been granted. In these circumstances, the orders were found to have been passed in violation of the mandatory hearing requirement under Section 22(4).
Conclusion: The impugned assessment orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration on merits after granting the petitioners a personal hearing.