1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Rules on Land Acquisition Compensation Disputes</h1> The High Court adjudicated on challenges to orders by the Land Acquisition Tribunal regarding compensation for agricultural land acquisition. The Court is ... - Issues:1. Challenge to orders passed by Land Acquisition Tribunal regarding compensation2. Tax assessment on compensation received under Capital Gains Scheme3. Challenge to reassessment notice under Income-tax Act4. Imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act5. Refusal of refund by tax authorities and invocation of writ jurisdictionAnalysis:1. The petitioner challenged the orders passed by the Land Acquisition Tribunal regarding the compensation awarded for the acquisition of agricultural land by the Improvement Trust for a development scheme. The petitioner and the Trust filed writ petitions challenging the Tribunal's orders, which are pending adjudication before the High Court.2. The petitioner received compensation in instalments during the pendency of litigation and claimed that a portion of it was not liable to be taxed under the Capital Gains Scheme. The assessing authority initially assessed a part of the compensation as income, but the Commissioner (Appeals) later deleted the addition. However, further assessment and appeals are pending.3. The assessing authority issued a notice for reassessment for previous years, which was challenged by the petitioner in a separate writ petition pending before the High Court. Subsequent assessments and appeals are also pending, with the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the petitioner's appeal against the assessment for a specific year.4. A penalty was imposed on the petitioner under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, which was later overturned by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal, which is still pending.5. The petitioner applied for a refund following the Commissioner (Appeals) order but was refused by the tax authorities. The petitioner invoked the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, citing sections 240 and 241 of the Act and relevant case law. The respondents opposed the refund, citing pending appeals and the need to protect revenue interests. The Court held that withholding a refund solely based on pending proceedings is not justified and ordered the refund to be granted within a specified period.This detailed analysis covers the various legal issues and outcomes of the judgment delivered by the High Court in this case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
