Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court allows appeal on time-barred order under Indian Income-tax Act, broadening appealable scope. Costs awarded to assessee.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Shahzadi Begum and others</h3> Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Shahzadi Begum and others - [1952] 21 ITR 1 Issues Involved:1. Whether the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting the appeal as time-barred was an order under Section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act.2. Whether an appeal against such an order lies to the Appellate Tribunal.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting the appeal as time-barred was an order under Section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act:The primary issue was to determine if the rejection of an appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner on the grounds of it being time-barred constituted an order under Section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Court examined the procedural aspects and the powers conferred by Sections 30 and 31 of the Act.The Court noted that under the Income-tax Act of 1922, before its amendment in 1939, Section 30 provided the right to appeal against assessment orders, while Section 31 outlined the procedure and powers for disposing of such appeals. The Court emphasized that Section 31 was the only section empowering the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to dispose of an appeal, whether it was on preliminary grounds or on merits.The Court referred to the definition of an appeal in the context of the Civil Procedure Code, as stated by Sir Dinshaw Mulla in Nagendranath Dey v. Suresh Chandra Dey, asserting that any application to an appellate court asking to set aside or revise a decision is an appeal, regardless of its competency. The Court applied this definition to the Income-tax Act, concluding that even an appeal rejected on preliminary grounds (such as being time-barred) falls under the appellate jurisdiction and powers described in Section 31.The Court also discussed the procedural necessity for the appellate authority to hear the appellant and consider preliminary objections, which are implicitly covered under the powers granted by Section 31. The Court found that the legislature intended for Section 31 to encompass all aspects of the appeal process, including the rejection of appeals on preliminary grounds.2. Whether an appeal against such an order lies to the Appellate Tribunal:The Court analyzed whether an appeal against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting an appeal as time-barred could be made to the Appellate Tribunal. The Court reviewed various precedents, including decisions from the Bombay, Allahabad, and Patna High Courts, and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.The Court found that the narrow construction of Section 31 by the Bombay and Allahabad High Courts, which limited the scope of appealable orders to those admitted within the prescribed period or after condonation of delay, left the appellate authority powerless to decide preliminary points. This interpretation was deemed incorrect as it deprived the aggrieved party of a remedy and made the appellate process unjust.Instead, the Court favored the liberal construction adopted by the Patna High Court, which included orders rejecting appeals on preliminary grounds within the purview of Section 31. This interpretation was supported by the principles laid down in the Privy Council's decision in Income-tax Commissioner v. Khemchand Ramdas, which emphasized the appellate authority's duty to decide preliminary issues as part of its appellate powers.The Court concluded that the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting the appeal as time-barred was indeed an order under Section 31 of the Act. Consequently, such an order was appealable to the Appellate Tribunal.Conclusion:The Court answered the reference in the affirmative, holding that the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting the appeal as time-barred was an order under Section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act and was appealable to the Appellate Tribunal. The Court awarded costs of Rs. 250 to the assessee.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found