TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows cenvat credit for consultancy services linked to manufacturing, emphasizing essential connection and business operations.</h1> <h3>Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Jaipur-II</h3> Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Jaipur-II - 2017 (51) S.T.R. 35 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:Cenvat credit eligibility for consultancy services related to railway siding establishment.Analysis:The case involved the appellants engaged in manufacturing Lead and Zinc Ores, utilizing a private Railway siding for transportation during an expansion project. The dispute arose when the Jurisdictional Central Excise Authorities denied cenvat credit for consultancy services related to the railway siding establishment, claiming no nexus between the services and manufactured goods. The ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial, leading to the matter before the Tribunal.The appellant argued that the disputed services qualified as 'input service' under the definition clause, crucial for their manufacturing business. Citing the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and a Tribunal decision, the appellant contended that the services were integrally connected with their business activities, thus eligible for cenvat credit. On the contrary, the Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the impugned order.The Tribunal, after hearing both sides and examining the records, delved into the interpretation of 'activities relating to business' under the definition of input service. Referring to the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's ruling in a similar case, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of laying railway lines for smooth transportation, integral to the appellants' business operations. It noted that the consultancy services' expenditure was part of the manufacturing cost, aligning with the principle established by the Hon'ble Court. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the service tax paid on the consultancy services was eligible for cenvat benefit.Furthermore, the Tribunal applied the precedent set by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, which emphasized the nexus or integral connection between services and the manufacture of final products for determining input service eligibility. Quoting the judgment, the Tribunal clarified that the definition of 'input service' was broader than 'input,' allowing services related to the business of manufacturing final products to qualify. Based on these legal interpretations, the Tribunal found no merit in the impugned order, setting it aside and ruling in favor of the appellants.In conclusion, the Tribunal's detailed analysis of the legal principles surrounding input service eligibility for consultancy services related to railway siding establishment resulted in allowing the appeals filed by the appellants, emphasizing the integral connection between the services and the manufacturing business for cenvat credit eligibility.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
