TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai: Delays Dismissed, Appeals Rejected for Unexplained 570-Day Delay</h1> <h3>M/s. Prachi Silks and M/s. Trimurti International Versus Commissioner of Customs, (Export) Chennai</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the condonation of delay applications due to the unexplained 570-day delay, resulting in the dismissal of ... Condonation of delay of 570 days - The application for condonation of delay does not reveal the truth. But only the past history of the proceeding is depicted therein. The delay of 570 days how occurred is not explained in the applications - Held that: - When the application fails to disclose the reason of delay and that too appealable reasons, that is made only to abuse the process of law. Accordingly, both the MA (CODs) are dismissed - In view of the dismissal of the COD applications, appeals not being maintainable are also dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the condonation of delay applications as they did not explain the 570-day delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as well. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing the reason for delay to avoid abusing the legal process.
TaxTMI 
