Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal classifies lease income as business income, allows deductions & depreciation</h1> <h3>Shreenathji Balaji Computech Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT-7 (2) Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal classified the income from 'Leave & License fees and Maintenance & Amenities charges' as 'Income from business,' allowing related ... Leave & License fees and Maintence & Amenities charges - “Income from other sources” or 'profit and gains of business or profession” - Held that:- The assessee had taken premises on lease from M/s. Mahalaxmi Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd and had subleased same to M/s. Rediff.com India Ltd. and in addition to the leave and license fee, had received maintenance charges. The said maintenance charges were for providing additional services to the sub lessee, which was in addition to the lease charges received for the occupation of the said premises. The assessee being engaged in a systemic activity of exploiting its asset, which in turn it had taken on lease, is thus involved in carrying on business activity. The income arising from such business activity is assessable in the hands of the assessee under the head income from business. The assessee is entitled to the claim of expenditure including the depreciation of assets but not the building, as the building was leased out, as deduction against such business income. Accordingly, we direct the AO to assess the income in the hands of the assessee under the head income from business after allowing the claim of expenditure in respect of the expenses and depreciation on assets. Issues Involved:1. Classification of 'Leave & License fees and Maintenance & Amenities charges' as 'Income from business' or 'Income from other sources.'2. Disallowance of personnel expenditure.3. Denial of depreciation claim.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Income:The primary issue revolves around whether the income from 'Leave & License fees and Maintenance & Amenities charges' should be classified as 'Income from business' or 'Income from other sources.' The assessee contended that leasing the premises and sub-leasing it, along with providing additional services, constituted a business activity. The Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] disagreed, treating the income as 'Income from other sources' and disallowing related expenses under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in *Chennai Properties and Investment Ltd. vs. CIT*, ruled that the assessee's activities were systematic and organized, aimed at exploiting the leased asset. The Tribunal concluded that the income should be classified as 'Income from business,' allowing the assessee to claim related expenditures and depreciation on assets.2. Disallowance of Personnel Expenditure:In the assessment year 2006-07, the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance of Rs. 13,56,776/- out of personnel expenditure incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal admitted this additional ground of appeal for adjudication, finding it related to the original ground concerning the classification of income. Given the Tribunal's decision to classify the income as 'Income from business,' the related personnel expenditure would be allowable as a business expense.3. Denial of Depreciation Claim:The CIT(A) also disallowed the depreciation claimed by the assessee. For the assessment year 2008-09, the CIT(A) enhanced the assessment by disallowing depreciation of Rs. 3,43,935/-. The Tribunal, however, directed the AO to allow the depreciation on assets (excluding the building, as it was leased out) as part of the business expenses, following the reclassification of the income as 'Income from business.'Conclusion:The Tribunal's consolidated order allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. It directed the AO to assess the income under the head 'Income from business,' permitting the deduction of related expenditures and depreciation on assets. The Tribunal's decision was influenced significantly by the precedent set in *Chennai Properties and Investment Ltd. vs. CIT*, emphasizing the systematic and organized nature of the assessee's leasing activities as a business operation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found