Provisional assessment and import licences required fresh examination before sustaining duty demand, confiscation, and penalties.

Where imported goods were provisionally assessed, the adjudicating authority had to examine the appellants' plea that replacement special import licences were subsequently produced and were relevant to the demand, confiscation and penalties. As no finding was recorded on that material defence, the confirmation of differential duty and penalties could not be sustained without fresh consideration of the licences' validity and effect. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication after hearing the parties.

---

---

Issues: Whether the confirmation of differential duty, confiscation of imported goods, and penalties could be sustained when the adjudicating authority did not examine the appellants' plea that valid special import licences subsequently produced should have been considered in the case of provisional assessment.

Analysis: The goods had been provisionally assessed. The appellants' specific defence that replacement licences were produced and ought to have been examined was not considered in the adjudication order, nor was any finding recorded on that material plea. In these circumstances, the demand and penalties could not be finally sustained without a fresh examination of the validity and effect of the licences.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo consideration after granting an opportunity of hearing.

---