TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Allahabad High Court: Capital contributions by partners not income from undisclosed sources</h1> <h3>India Rice Mills Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> India Rice Mills Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax - [1996] 218 ITR 508, 85 TAXMANN 227 Issues involved: Interpretation of u/s 68/69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding treatment of a sum of Rs. 1,43,000 as income from undisclosed source of the petitioner-firm before commencement of business.Summary:The High Court of ALLAHABAD was directed u/s 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to consider whether the Tribunal was correct in invoking section 68/69 of the Act and treating Rs. 1,43,000 as income from undisclosed source of the petitioner-firm which had not yet commenced its business. The assessee-firm was formed during the accounting year 1978-79, with capital contributions of Rs. 1,43,000 made by partners before the firm started operations. The assessing authority added this amount to the firm's income as undisclosed, as partners had not filed income returns prior to these deposits. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed, stating that pre-business deposits could not be treated as undisclosed income. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition, emphasizing the need for the firm to explain the source of deposits credited in its books.In its judgment, the High Court found the Tribunal's decision erroneous, highlighting that the deposits were capital contributions made by partners before the firm commenced business. The Court noted that the onus was on the partners to explain the source of these deposits, and if they failed to do so, the amount should have been added to the partners' income, not the firm's. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal's reliance on a previous case, distinguishing the current scenario where all deposits were made before business operations began. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the deposits were not income from undisclosed sources for the firm. The case record was to be sent back to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action in line with the High Court's decision.
TaxTMI 