Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delimitation notification issued under the Delimitation Commission Act, 1962 was a law made under Article 327 of the Constitution and, therefore, immune from challenge in court under Article 329(a).
Analysis: Article 327 empowers Parliament to make law on matters connected with elections, including the delimitation of constituencies. Although Article 82 contemplates readjustment after each census, the statutory scheme of the Delimitation Commission Act, 1962 shows that the Commission is constituted to make binding determinations on the allocation of seats and delimitation of constituencies on the basis of the latest census figures. Sections 8 and 9 require the Commission to determine and publish the relevant orders after considering objections and suggestions, and Section 10 provides that upon publication such orders have the force of law and supersede inconsistent provisions of the earlier electoral law. The publication of the orders thus gives them the character of law made under Article 327 rather than a mere administrative direction. Once so treated, Article 329(a) bars the validity of such law from being called in question in any court.
Conclusion: The challenge to the delimitation notification was not maintainable, and the dismissal of the writ petition was .