Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tribunal excludes comparables in Transfer Pricing Adjustment appeal, directs reassessment for taxpayer</h1> The appeal involved a Transfer Pricing Adjustment of Rs. 1,11,51,669 by the Assessing Officer, based on international transactions. The Dispute Resolution ... Transfer pricing adjustment - comparable selection - Held that:- In view of the matter, following the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Pegasystems Worldwide India Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad [2015 (10) TMI 2495 - ITAT HYDERABAD] we accept the contentions of the assessee in its appeal and direct the Assessing Officer/TPO to redetermine the transfer pricing adjustment, if any, warranted, after excluding the above three comparables [ E-Infochips Bangalore ltd., Kals information Systems ltd. and Tata Elxsi Ltd.(Seg)] from the TP study. Issues Involved:1. Addition of Rs. 1,11,51,669 on account of Transfer Pricing Adjustment.2. Inclusion of three companies (E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd., and Tata Elxsi Ltd.) in the list of comparables for determining the Arm's Length Price.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Addition of Rs. 1,11,51,669 on account of Transfer Pricing AdjustmentThe appeal concerns an addition of Rs. 1,11,51,669 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to Transfer Pricing Adjustment related to the international transactions of the assessee. The AO's order was passed under S.143(3) read with S.144(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), Hyderabad. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) selected eighteen comparables and determined the Arithmetic Mean Margin of OP/TC of the comparables post working capital adjustment at 20.59%. Applying this margin to the operating cost of Rs. 17,96,31,488, the TPO determined the arm's length price at Rs. 21,66,17,611, resulting in a transfer price adjustment of Rs. 1,31,63,541. The DRP accepted the assessee's objections for five comparables but upheld the inclusion of three companies, leading to the final addition of Rs. 1,11,51,669.Issue 2: Inclusion of Three Companies in the List of ComparablesThe core grievance of the assessee pertains to the inclusion of three companies-E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd., and Tata Elxsi Ltd.-in the list of comparables for determining the Arm's Length Price.E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd.:The assessee objected to this company's inclusion, arguing that the information for FY 2009-10 was not publicly available and that the company is functionally different, engaged in both software development and ITES. The TPO used the annual report of FY 2010-11 to extract information for FY 2009-10, which the assessee contested. The Tribunal noted that the company is engaged in diversified activities without segmental information, making it incomparable to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's plea to exclude E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd. from the comparables.Kals Information Systems Ltd.:The assessee argued that Kals Information Systems Ltd. is functionally different, engaged in software development and software products, with significant inventories. The TPO included it as a comparable, but the Tribunal found that the company is engaged in both software development and software products, making it functionally different from the assessee. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Kals Information Systems Ltd. from the comparables.Tata Elxsi Ltd.:The assessee contended that Tata Elxsi Ltd. is engaged in specialized services, including embedded software development, making it functionally different. The Tribunal noted that Tata Elxsi Ltd. has complex activities and lacks segmental information, rendering it incomparable. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Tata Elxsi Ltd. from the comparables.Conclusion:The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contentions and directed the AO/TPO to redetermine the transfer pricing adjustment after excluding the three contested comparables. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.Order Pronounced:The order was pronounced in the court on 19.02.2016.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found