Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a development agreement, without handing over possession and without payment of the entire consideration, constituted a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 so as to attract capital gains.
Analysis: The agreement provided that possession would be delivered only on receipt of the full consideration, and the record did not show that possession had been handed over or that the entire agreed amount had been paid. Section 2(47)(v) covers a deemed transfer only where the transaction, in substance, answers the requirements of part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 or otherwise enables enjoyment of the immovable property by the transferee. On the facts, the amount received was only an advance towards the proposed transaction, and the legal conditions for an effective transfer were not satisfied. The capital gain computation made by the Assessing Officer was therefore not justified.
Conclusion: The development agreement did not amount to a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition on account of capital gains could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A development agreement does not give rise to a deemed transfer for capital gains purposes unless possession is handed over and the transaction satisfies the conditions of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.